Brandon Nakashima vs Arthur Rinderknech Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nakashima vs Rinderknech analysis and find out who is favored!
Brandon Nakashima vs Arthur Rinderknech Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nakashima has won 56.48% of points on his second serve, while Rinderknech has won 50.75%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nakashima, in recent form, has won 47.93% of his opponent's second serve points, while Rinderknech has won 46.41%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.96% and 25.17% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nakashima has saved 69.96% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rinderknech has saved 63.87% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nakashima has won 60.98% of matches played (W/L 50/ 32), with Rinderknech winning 50% (W/L 34/ 34) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nakashima has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 54/ 21), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 26/ 25). Rinderknech has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 93/ 56), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 11/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Nakashima has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 76.32% of matches (W/L 29/ 9), where as Rinderknech has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 43.75% of matches (W/L 14/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Nakashima winning 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Nakashima winning 3 and Rinderknech winning 3. The last match between Nakashima and Rinderknech was at the Open Parc - Lyon, 23-05-2023, Second, Clay with Brandon Nakashima getting the victory 7-6(6) 1-6 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:20:44.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nakashima and Rinderknech have played a deciding set 2 times, with Nakashima winning 1 times and Rinderknech 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Nakashima winning 2, and Rinderknech 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nakashima has played against opponents with an average rank of 225.22 while Rinderknech has played against players with an average rank of 175.96.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nakashima has won 41% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rinderknech has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nakashima has converted 34.84% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rinderknech has converted 33.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nakashima 1 - 1 Rinderknech
7
Total
0
Mast
4
Chall
0
Slam
1
Main
2
Minor
72
Rank
43
High
22
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
73
Rank
42
High
28
Age
R
Plays
11
Total
0
Mast
6
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
Form
61% (190-119)
Career Total W/L
61% (280-180)
71% (32-13)
YTD W/L
50% (15-15)
$1,648,985
Career Prize Money
$1,098,825
1
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nakashima VS Rinderknech H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Brandon Nakashima | Arthur Rinderknech |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
Sets Won | 3 | 3 |
Games Won | 27 | 35 |
Aces (Total) | 15 | 25 |
DFs (Total) | 4 | 7 |
Avg Match Time | 2:20:44 | 2:20:44 |
1st Serve % | 62% (113/182) | 64% (128/200) |
1st Serve Win% | 69% (78/113) | 75% (96/128) |
2nd Serve Win% | 58% (40/69) | 54% (39/72) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 39% (7/18) |
Return Points W% | 33% (65/200) | 35% (64/182) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
Nakashima VS Rinderknech H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(6) 1-6 7-5 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
62%
(
62 of
100)
1st Serve %
61%
(
64 of
105)
6
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
34%
(
34 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
35 of
105)
101
Total Points Won
104
|
||||
6-7(7) 6-1 6-4 |
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Brandon Nakashima
67%
(
64 of
95)
1st Serve %
62%
(
51 of
82)
12
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
1
80%
(
51 of
64)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
30 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
95
Total Points Won
82
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Brandon Nakashima | Arthur Rinderknech |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 71% (32/13) | 50% (15/15) |
Sets Win/Loss | 66% (66/34) | 51% (40/39) |
Games Win/Loss | 54% (556/471) | 50% (416/415) |
Hard Win/Loss | 73% (11/4) | 44% (4/5) |
Clay Win/Loss | 67% (10/5) | 25% (2/6) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 73% (11/4) | 69% (9/4) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.68 | 0.71 |
Aces Total | 341 | 289 |
DFs per game | 0.13 | 0.12 |
DFs Total | 66 | 50 |
Avg Match Time | 1:49:41 | 2:10:22 |
Avg Opp Rank | 269.22 | 207.27 |
1st Serve % | 65% (2094/3246) | 65% (1625/2494) |
1st Serve W% | 75% (1563/2094) | 77% (1252/1625) |
2nd Serve W% | 57% (653/1152) | 51% (441/869) |
BPs Won% Total | 33% (93/278) | 33% (61/183) |
Return Pts W% | 37% (1245/3383) | 33% (865/2615) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Masters W/L | 64% (7/4) | 20% (1/4) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 67% (4/2) | 50% (5/5) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 78% (21/6) | 64% (9/5) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 70% (31/44) | 52% (15/29) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (16/24) | 35% (6/17) |
Deciding Set W% | 67% (8/12) | 47% (8/17) |
1st set W, W | 90% (30/27) | 85% (13/11) |
1st set W, L | 10% (30/3) | 15% (13/2) |
1st set L, W | 29% (14/4) | 24% (17/4) |
Brandon Nakashima Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Brandon Nakashima
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Jesper De Jong
49%
(
42 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
70%
(
30 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
26 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
98)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Nerman Fatic
53%
(
39 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
41 of
56)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
20 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Francisco Comesana
64%
(
65 of
101)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
82)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
37%
(
37 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
QF |
Roman Safiullin
Player
Brandon Nakashima
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
77%
(
17 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
56%
(
61 of
108)
1st Serve %
69%
(
68 of
99)
16
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
40 of
68)
38%
(
18 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
46%
(
50 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
99)
106
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Brandon Nakashima
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
80)
5
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
10%
(
1 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
17 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
80)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
QF |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
59 of
91)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
86%
(
49 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
45 of
59)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
15 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
24 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(4) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Reda Bennani
69%
(
61 of
89)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
101)
12
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
51 of
101)
110
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R3 |
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Brandon Nakashima
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve %
62%
(
77 of
125)
6
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
0
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
53 of
77)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
46 of
125)
108
Total Points Won
110
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Arthur Rinderknech Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Francesco Passaro
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
61%
(
71 of
117)
1st Serve %
59%
(
69 of
117)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
75%
(
53 of
71)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
58 of
69)
70%
(
32 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
32 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
35 of
117)
120
Total Points Won
114
|
6-7(3) 7-5 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
72%
(
59 of
82)
1st Serve %
57%
(
53 of
93)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
40 of
53)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
57 of
100)
1st Serve %
58%
(
57 of
99)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
63%
(
27 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
29 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
99)
105
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 6-7(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alexander Shevchenko
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
59%
(
57 of
96)
1st Serve %
55%
(
47 of
86)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
37 of
47)
62%
(
24 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
30 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
86)
94
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
73%
(
37 of
51)
3
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
1
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
17 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Hugo Gaston
63%
(
65 of
104)
1st Serve %
57%
(
59 of
104)
11
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
48 of
59)
69%
(
27 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
28 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
32 of
104)
108
Total Points Won
100
|
6-7(6) 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Federico Coria
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
51 of
85)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
David Goffin
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve %
46%
(
28 of
61)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
73%
(
76 of
104)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
94)
3
Aces
12
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
42 of
53)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
34 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
94)
103
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Blaise Bicknell
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
10
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
0
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
26 of
34)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
17 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more